Frame the decision
We identify the systems, versions, workflow, deadline, and the specific question the review must answer.
How it works
A small engagement with a concrete finish line.
The process is deliberately narrow: define the decision, examine the available evidence, make uncertainty explicit, and turn it into a plan.
Collect the evidence
You provide the relevant public or approved documents. We confirm the evidence boundary before review begins.
Compare and classify
Claims are cited and classified as supported, unsupported, conditional, conflicting, or unknown.
Turn gaps into tests
Material findings become questions, prerequisites, and acceptance scenarios with observable outcomes.
Read out and hand off
We review the findings, decisions, and next actions, then deliver the working artifacts.
What we need
Documents and context.
- Product names and versions
- Relevant conformance and interface documentation
- Required workflows or use cases
- Known constraints, decisions, and deadlines
What we do not need
PHI or production access.
- Patient images or identifiers
- Credentials, endpoints, or network diagrams
- Access to production clinical systems
- Internal information not approved for review
Ready to frame the question?
Tell us what is changing and what cannot surprise you.
We’ll respond with fit, scope, and the next useful step.
Discuss a project