Integration Compatibility Review
Compare the stated capabilities of systems that need to exchange images, worklists, results, or context.
Explore the reviewIndependent imaging integration review
Know what will work before go-live.
We turn DICOM conformance statements, workflow requirements, and project assumptions into a practical, cited acceptance plan—before the calendar and the interface engine are under pressure.
Document-based review. No PHI. No production access required.
Integration evidence map
DICOMSystem AClaims & roles
WorkflowRequirementsWhat must happen
DICOMSystem BClaims & roles
PreflightCompare • cite • classify
Acceptance planProve it before go-live
Evidence inVendor documents, requirements, assumptions
Gaps made visibleSupported, unsupported, conditional, unknown
Test plan outNamed checks, expected results, ownership
Three starting points
One disciplined preflight.
Start where the risk is showing up: compatibility, acceptance, or change. Each engagement uses the same evidence-first method.
Go-Live Acceptance Plan
Turn requirements and vendor documentation into tests your project team can actually execute and sign off.
Explore the reviewUpgrade & Change Impact Review
Identify what an upgrade, replacement, or configuration change could invalidate—and what should be re-tested.
Explore the reviewThe problem
A conformance statement is evidence. It is not an implementation plan.
Imaging projects often enter testing with good people, valid documents, and too many unspoken assumptions. The result is familiar: avoidable surprises appear when access, timelines, and attention are most constrained.
Imaging Preflight creates a neutral working view of what the supplied evidence supports, where the evidence is silent, and exactly what must be proven in acceptance testing.
What a conformance statement can—and cannot—proveWhat you receive
Useful artifacts, not another slide deck.
Evidence matrix
A cited comparison of required capabilities and the documentation supplied.
Gap and unknown register
A plain-language record of what is supported, unsupported, conditional, or not yet proven.
Acceptance plan
Test cases with expected results, dependencies, and recommended ownership.
Readout
A focused review of material findings, decisions, and next actions with your team.
A calm check before a consequential change
Have an integration, upgrade, or go-live approaching?
Send the non-sensitive project outline. We’ll tell you whether a preflight review is a good fit.
Start a conversation